Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) Scorecard Archive
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) — EMA Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc. + Carryover
2007 $16,308,921 $4,142,096 $-33,393 $4,108,703 25.19% $393,203 $4,501,906
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY07
Dates in Period 8/08-0/08 1/08-2/08 3/08-7/08 8/08-7/08
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY07
Projected Dollars $1,875,794 $750,318 $1,875,794 $4,501,906
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $484,333 $778,935 $3,082,448 $4,345,716
Percent 10.76% 17.30% 68.47% 96.53%
Variance Dollars $-1,391,461 $28,617 $1,206,654 $-156,190
Percent -30.91% 0.64% 26.80% -3.47%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY07   Units Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY07
Projected Clients 1,988 795 1,988 4,771 Projected Units 9,504 3,802 9,504 22,810
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 2,739 261 1,167 4,167 Actual Units 6,892 1,108 11,541 19,541
Percent 57.41% 5.47% 24.46% 87.34% Percent 30.21% 4.86% 50.60% 85.67%
Variance Clients 751 -534 -821 -604 Variance Units -2,612 -2,694 2,037 -3,269
Percent 15.74% -11.20% -17.21% -12.66% Percent -11.45% -11.81% 8.93% -14.33%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category performing at 18 percent expenditure rate. 1 Fiscal: Category performing below expenditure rate. Should money be programmed out of category?
Program: Performing at 53 percent of projected client goals and 23 percent of unit goals. Technical assistance provided to four providers. Program: Planning council planning will be adjusted upon outcomes of the technical assistance provided to the four providers.
Fiscal: Category performing at 29 percent expenditure rate. 2 Fiscal: Planning council should consider moving funds.
Program: Category performing at 50 percent of client goals and 55 percent of unit goals. Program: Client goals and service units were adjusted downwards, which accounts for meeting mid-year projections.
Fiscal: Nearly half of the unspent funds were from carryover. 3 Fiscal: Category expended 97 percent of funds.
Program: Category reached 87 percent of their adjusted client goals and 86 percent of their adjusted units. Program: Category did not meet client and unit goals even after adjustments were made.
Funding Adjustments Reprogramming Date Amount Date Amount
November 06, 2007 $-33,393 November 01, 2007 $393,203
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2007 $16,308,921   $4,142,096 $4,108,703 25.19% $4,345,716 $-237,013
2006   $18,975,908 $4,271,116 $4,208,576 22.18% $4,162,387 $46,189
2005   $17,144,692 $3,801,530 $3,698,985 21.58% $3,607,428 $91,557
2004   $17,811,946 $3,949,585 $3,983,585 22.36% $3,881,617 $101,968
2003   $19,461,123 $4,847,766 $4,854,590 24.95% $4,743,406 $111,184
2002   $16,137,634 $4,071,928 $4,640,157 28.75% $4,359,510 $280,647
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2007 4,771 4,167 -604 $1,042 80.0% 42.0%
2006 4,962 4,214 -748 $987 80.0% 42.0%
2005 4,386 4,309 -77 $837 82.0% 33.5%
2004 4,637 4,581 -56 $847 83.0% 33.9%
2003 5,300 5,184 -116 $915 74.5% 32.1%
2002 3,337 3,714 377 $1,173 82.6% 34.6%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2007.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $4,108,703
DHMH, Medical Assistance, AIDS HealthChoice Enrollment $67,194,472
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice Disabled Enrollment $16,612,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice FAC Enrollment $3,794,395
DHMH, Infectious Disease and Environmental Health Administration. $2,900,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV/AIDS Primary Adult Care (PAC) Enrollment $2,021,104
Baltimore City RW Part B $1,413,044
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants $1,113,985
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants. $1,017,362
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early intervention. $603,827
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early. $603,748
Represents two RW Part C-funded program (not an aggregate of all Part C programs for this service). $440,629
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $184,660
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $177,891
Baltimore Co. RW Part B $109,208



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $156,190
Performance Summary:
Category performing at the mid-to-high 80 percent level.
Compared to Last Year:
Fiscal year 2007 was a transition year for the new legislation and administrative entity.
Unmet Need:
Unable to identify.
Questions:
What is the grantee's plan for helping providers make better client, unit and fiscal projections?
Comments:
Planning council should consider reducing funding from fiscal year 2007 level. Changes to client, unit and fiscal projections must be explained to PC before being implemented.
FY 2008 Info Rank: M2 EMA Award: $15,625,276

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.