Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Hospice Services Scorecard Archive
Hospice Services — EMA Period 1 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2007 $16,308,921 $96,927 $0 $96,927 0.59% $0 $96,927
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 YTD FY07
Dates in Period 8/08-0/08 8/08-0/08
Months in Period 5 5
Expenditures Period 1 YTD FY07
Projected Dollars $40,386 $40,386
Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Dollars $43,724 $43,724
Percent 45.11% 45.11%
Variance Dollars $3,338 $3,338
Percent 3.44% 3.44%
Clients Period 1 YTD FY07   Units Period 1 YTD FY07
Projected Clients 14 14 Projected Units 319 319
Percent 41.67% 41.67% Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Clients 17 17 Actual Units 384 384
Percent 50.00% 50.00% Percent 50.13% 50.13%
Variance Clients 3 3 Variance Units 65 65
Percent 8.33% 8.33% Percent 8.46% 8.46%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2007 $16,308,921   $96,927 $96,927 0.59% $43,724 $53,203
2006   $18,975,908 $134,729 $124,729 0.66% $114,196 $10,533
2005   $17,144,692 $133,729 $133,729 0.78% $116,929 $16,800
2004   $17,811,946 $144,153 $129,153 0.73% $128,655 $498
2003   $19,461,123 $208,234 $192,971 0.99% $175,179 $17,792
2002   $16,137,634 $178,066 $281,235 1.74% $260,197 $21,038
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2007 34 17 -17 $2,572 32.0% 21.0%
2006 54 34 -20 $3,358 83.0% 42.0%
2005 56 56 0 $2,088 85.7% 35.7%
2004 124 59 -65 $2,180 100.0% 39.0%
2003 105 124 19 $1,412 73.4% 22.6%
2002 110 95 -15 $2,738 78.9% 44.2%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 69 percent of the 39 respondents reporting a need for Hospice Services said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 34
Est. percent of need met: 31%
Est. clients needing service: 109
Clients served (2007): 17
Est. clients not served (2007): 92
Cost per client (2007): $2,572
Cost to meet need:    $236,624 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $96,927



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $53,203
FY 2008 Info Rank: M12 EMA Award: $15,625,276

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.