Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Medical Transportation Scorecard Archive
Medical Transportation — EMA Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2006 $18,975,908 $180,271 $0 $180,271 0.95% $0 $180,271
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Dates in Period 8/07-0/07 1/07-2/07 8/07-2/07
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Projected Dollars $75,113 $30,045 $105,158
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $62,730 $20,275 $83,005
Percent 34.80% 11.25% 46.04%
Variance Dollars $-12,383 $-9,770 $-22,153
Percent -6.87% -5.42% -12.29%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Projected Clients 758 303 1,061 Projected Units 19,158 7,663 26,821
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 919 238 1,157 Actual Units 6,999 1,559 8,558
Percent 50.52% 13.08% 63.61% Percent 15.22% 3.39% 18.61%
Variance Clients 161 -65 96 Variance Units -12,159 -6,104 -18,263
Percent 8.86% -3.58% 5.27% Percent -26.44% -13.28% -39.72%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
Fiscal: 2 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2006 $18,975,908   $180,271 $180,271 0.95% $83,005 $97,266
2005   $17,144,692 $186,877 $186,877 1.09% $193,048 $-6,171
2004   $17,811,946 $194,150 $218,250 1.23% $212,685 $5,565
2003   $19,461,123 $202,396 $202,396 1.04% $190,133 $12,263
2002   $16,137,634 $170,806 $170,806 1.06% $160,869 $9,937
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2006 1,819 1,157 -662 $71 98.0% 52.0%
2005 1,973 2,475 502 $77 91.0% 38.1%
2004 3,734 2,690 -1,044 $79 85.0% 36.4%
2003 3,904 3,819 -85 $49 83.5% 34.0%
2002 2,919 3,150 231 $51 86.7% 32.2%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 17 percent of the 516 respondents reporting a need for Medical Transportation said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 1,683
Est. percent of need met: 83%
Est. clients needing service: 2,027
Clients served (2006): 1,157
Est. clients not served (2006): 870
Cost per client (2006): $71
Cost to meet need:    $61,770 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $180,271
Anne Arundel County, Ryan White Part B. $104,703
Howard County, Ryan White Part B. $1,500
Queen Anne’s County, Ryan White Part B. $200



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $97,266
FY 2007 Info EMA Award: $16,308,921

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.