Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Psychosocial Support Scorecard Archive
Psychosocial Support — EMA Period 1 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2007 $16,308,921 $113,386 $0 $113,386 0.70% $0 $113,386
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 YTD FY07
Dates in Period 8/08-0/08 8/08-0/08
Months in Period 5 5
Expenditures Period 1 YTD FY07
Projected Dollars $47,244 $47,244
Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Dollars $52,587 $52,587
Percent 46.38% 46.38%
Variance Dollars $5,343 $5,343
Percent 4.71% 4.71%
Clients Period 1 YTD FY07   Units Period 1 YTD FY07
Projected Clients 125 125 Projected Units 219 219
Percent 41.67% 41.67% Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Clients 164 164 Actual Units 345 345
Percent 54.67% 54.67% Percent 65.71% 65.71%
Variance Clients 39 39 Variance Units 126 126
Percent 13.00% 13.00% Percent 24.05% 24.05%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2007 $16,308,921   $113,386 $113,386 0.70% $52,587 $60,799
2006   $18,975,908 $383,313 $403,313 2.13% $386,527 $16,786
2005   $17,144,692 $385,756 $385,756 2.25% $377,512 $8,244
2004   $17,811,946 $400,769 $400,769 2.25% $399,884 $885
2003   $19,461,123 $449,552 $449,552 2.31% $418,098 $31,454
2002   $16,137,634 $414,793 $426,163 2.64% $407,153 $19,010
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2007 300 164 -136 $320 85.0% 47.0%
2006 758 763 5 $506 93.0% 48.0%
2005 639 1,049 410 $359 84.1% 30.3%
2004 1,745 1,172 -573 $341 82.0% 23.1%
2003 1,967 1,812 -155 $230 89.0% 38.5%
2002 1,388 1,881 493 $216 88.2% 40.9%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 27 percent of the 420 respondents reporting a need for Psychosocial Support said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 763
Est. percent of need met: 73%
Est. clients needing service: 1,045
Clients served (2007): 164
Est. clients not served (2007): 881
Cost per client (2007): $320
Cost to meet need:    $281,920 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $113,386
MAI (EMA and Counties) $180,372
Baltimore City Ryan White Part B. $117,451
Howard County Ryan White Part B. $23,063
Carroll County Ryan White Part B. $2,283
Queen Anne’s County Ryan White Part B. $269



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $60,799
FY 2008 Info Rank: S4 EMA Award: $15,625,276

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.