Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Mental Health Services Scorecard Archive
Mental Health Services — EMA Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2006 $18,975,908 $654,565 $15,000 $669,565 3.53% $0 $669,565
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06
Dates in Period 8/07-0/07 1/07-2/07 3/07-7/07 8/07-7/07
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06
Projected Dollars $278,985 $111,594 $278,985 $669,565
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $75,065 $102,047 $488,283 $665,395
Percent 11.21% 15.24% 72.93% 99.38%
Variance Dollars $-203,920 $-9,547 $209,298 $-4,170
Percent -30.46% -1.43% 31.26% -0.62%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06   Units Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06
Projected Clients 401 161 401 963 Projected Units 2,274 910 2,274 5,457
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 449 117 273 839 Actual Units 1,697 952 2,522 5,171
Percent 46.63% 12.15% 28.35% 87.12% Percent 31.10% 17.45% 46.22% 94.76%
Variance Clients 48 -44 -128 -124 Variance Units -577 42 248 -286
Percent 4.96% -4.52% -13.32% -12.88% Percent -10.57% 0.78% 4.55% -5.24%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Under spending, four contracts not reporting. 1 Fiscal: Monitor spending like first period of 2005, analysis difficult with 50 percent of contracts not reporting.
Program: Client performace as planned, units below plan by over 10 percent. Program: Monitor units, reprogram funds if performance continues to be below goals.
Fiscal: Two providers with four contracts have not reported $164,679. 2 Fiscal: Category historically leaves funds, 50 percent of contracts not reporting, consider reducing award.
Program: Client projections are on target. Program: Does performance include data from all providers?
Fiscal: Accounted for $488,283 in the last five months of year, including $15,000 in reprogramming. 3 Fiscal: How much of the $488,000 was unreported in the second ESD? It is impossible for planning council to plan with such under reporting.
Program: Served 78 percent of projected clients but provided 95 percent of units. Program: Were the 2006 clients in need of more lengthy service as shown by high units given? Trend for 2008?
Funding Adjustments Reprogramming Date Amount
November 21, 2006 $15,000
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2006 $18,975,908   $654,565 $669,565 3.53% $665,395 $4,170
2005   $17,144,692 $562,346 $584,232 3.41% $581,911 $2,321
2004   $17,811,946 $584,232 $655,840 3.68% $649,551 $6,289
2003   $19,461,123 $655,840 $617,306 3.17% $601,430 $15,876
2002   $16,137,634 $556,701 $561,907 3.48% $549,664 $12,243
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2006 963 839 -124 $793 86.0% 30.4%
2005 793 927 134 $627 95.0% 25.4%
2004 1,376 830 -546 $782 84.0% 24.5%
2003 974 1,041 67 $577 76.7% 32.1%
2002 747 750 3 $732 80.4% 28.9%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on Mental Health Services available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2006.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $669,565
Baltimore City, Ryan White Part B. $421,640



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $4,170
Performance Summary:
Only 78 percent of planned clients served, but units at 95 percent of plan. 99 percent of funds spent.
Compared to Last Year:
About $107,000 more in 2006 but served 88 fewer clients. Received $15,000 in reprogramming in 2006.
Unmet Need:
59 percent need service, 23 percent could not get service.
Questions:
2006 clients drop, new resources for RW clients? 839 of 1073 clients used 95 percent of planned units, what are the implications of this?
Comments:
Must have timely reporting for PC to plan. New carryover requirements will force moving funds, no report = no spending = move funds.
FY 2007 Info EMA Award: $16,308,921

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.