Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Health Insurance Premiums & Cost-sharing Asst. Scorecard Archive
Health Insurance Premiums & Cost-sharing Asst. — Counties Period 1 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking County Set Aside Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Set Aside Carryover Total Alloc.
2008 $2,411,806 $15,440 $0 $15,440 0.64% $0 $15,440
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 YTD FY08
Dates in Period 8/09-0/09 8/09-0/09
Months in Period 5 5
Expenditures Period 1 YTD FY08
Projected Dollars $6,433 $6,433
Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Dollars $5,991 $5,991
Percent 38.80% 38.80%
Variance Dollars $-442 $-442
Percent -2.86% -2.86%
Clients Period 1 YTD FY08   Units Period 1 YTD FY08
Projected Clients 22 22 Projected Units 215 215
Percent 41.67% 41.67% Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Clients 90 90 Actual Units 589 589
Percent 169.81% 169.81% Percent 114.37% 114.37%
Variance Clients 68 68 Variance Units 374 374
Percent 128.14% 128.14% Percent 72.70% 72.70%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category exceeded projections for clients however not service units. 1 Fiscal: Why does category significantly exceed projections for clients but not service units?
Program: The majority of new intakes occur at the beginning of the fiscal year — performance area should level-out throughout FY2008. Program: Client projections should be adjusted.
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY County Set Aside Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Set Aside Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2008 $2,411,806   $15,440 $15,440 0.64% $5,991 $9,449
2007   $2,470,676 $16,076 $20,376 0.82% $18,514 $1,862
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2008 53 90 37 $66 72.0% 42.0%
2007 118 140 22 $132 76.0% 51.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on Health Insurance Premiums & Cost-sharing Asst. available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2008.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A Counties $15,440
(RW Part A EMA) $101,105



RW Part A Counties
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $9,449
FY 2009 Info Rank: M6 County Set Aside: $2,334,014 Allocation: $15,000 (0.64% of Set Aside)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.