Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Hospice Services Scorecard Archive
Hospice Services — EMA Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2008 M12 $15,625,276 $91,913 $0 $91,913 0.59% $0 $91,913
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08
Dates in Period 8/09-0/09 1/09-2/09 8/09-2/09
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08
Projected Dollars $38,297 $15,319 $53,616
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $38,833 $9,553 $48,386
Percent 42.25% 10.39% 52.64%
Variance Dollars $536 $-5,766 $-5,230
Percent 0.58% -6.27% -5.69%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08
Projected Clients 10 4 13 Projected Units 114 46 159
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 9 5 14 Actual Units 286 -25 261
Percent 39.13% 21.74% 60.87% Percent 104.76% -9.16% 95.60%
Variance Clients -1 1 1 Variance Units 172 -71 102
Percent -2.54% 5.07% 2.54% Percent 63.10% -25.82% 37.27%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: The category served only 53 percent of projected clients but exceeded service units provided by 18 percent. Program:
Fiscal: The category served only 53 percent of projected clients but exceeded service units provided by 18 percent. 2 Fiscal:
Program: The category served fewer clients because fewer applicants were eligibility for Ryan White services. Program: Why have fewer patients qualified for Ryan White services?
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2008 $15,625,276   $91,913 $91,913 0.59% $48,386 $43,527
2007   $16,308,921 $96,927 $96,927 0.59% $96,927 $0
2006   $18,975,908 $134,729 $124,729 0.66% $114,196 $10,533
2005   $17,144,692 $133,729 $133,729 0.78% $116,929 $16,800
2004   $17,811,946 $144,153 $129,153 0.73% $128,655 $498
2003   $19,461,123 $208,234 $192,971 0.99% $175,179 $17,792
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2008 23 14 -9 $3,456 64.0% 21.0%
2007 44 29 -15 $3,342 74.0% 32.0%
2006 54 34 -20 $3,358 83.0% 42.0%
2005 56 56 0 $2,088 85.7% 35.7%
2004 124 59 -65 $2,180 100.0% 39.0%
2003 105 124 19 $1,412 73.4% 22.6%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 69 percent of the 39 respondents reporting a need for Hospice Services said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 34
Est. percent of need met: 31%
Est. clients needing service: 109
Clients served (2008): 14
Est. clients not served (2008): 95
Cost per client (2008): $3,456
Cost to meet need:    $328,320 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $91,913



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $43,527
FY 2009 Info Rank: M10 EMA Award: $17,433,707 Allocation: $98,449 (0.56% of Award)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.