Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity Scorecard Archive
OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity — EMA Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2006 $18,975,908 $360,542 $0 $360,542 1.90% $0 $360,542
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Dates in Period 8/07-0/07 1/07-2/07 8/07-2/07
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Projected Dollars $150,226 $60,090 $210,316
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $103,778 $51,952 $155,730
Percent 28.78% 14.41% 43.19%
Variance Dollars $-46,448 $-8,138 $-54,586
Percent -12.88% -2.26% -15.14%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Projected Clients 119 48 166 Projected Units 1,476 590 2,066
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 154 26 180 Actual Units 833 280 1,113
Percent 54.04% 9.12% 63.16% Percent 23.52% 7.91% 31.42%
Variance Clients 35 -22 14 Variance Units -643 -310 -953
Percent 12.37% -7.54% 4.82% Percent -18.15% -8.76% -26.91%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
Fiscal: 2 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2006 $18,975,908   $360,542 $360,542 1.90% $155,730 $204,812
2005   $17,144,692 $310,319 $310,319 1.81% $311,296 $-977
2004   $17,811,946 $322,396 $322,396 1.81% $318,658 $3,738
2003   $19,461,123 $366,297 $354,297 1.82% $344,242 $10,055
2002   $16,137,634 $270,042 $302,127 1.87% $294,922 $7,205
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2006 285 180 -105 $865 89.0% 38.0%
2005 246 310 64 $1,004 69.0% 28.1%
2004 348 248 -100 $1,284 97.2% 41.5%
2003 375 359 -16 $958 88.9% 29.0%
2002 395 366 -29 $805
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2006.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $360,542



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $204,812
FY 2007 Info EMA Award: $16,308,921

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.