Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Case Management (Non-medical) Scorecard Archive
Case Management (Non-medical) — EMA Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc. + Carryover
2006 $18,975,908 $345,362 $2,000 $347,362 1.83% $15,000 $362,362
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Dates in Period 8/07-0/07 1/07-2/07 8/07-2/07
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Projected Dollars $150,984 $60,394 $211,378
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $118,898 $55,651 $174,549
Percent 32.81% 15.36% 48.17%
Variance Dollars $-32,086 $-4,743 $-36,829
Percent -8.85% -1.31% -10.16%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY06
Projected Clients 1,158 463 1,621 Projected Units 8,499 3,400 11,898
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 1,920 256 2,176 Actual Units 12,437 4,541 16,978
Percent 69.11% 9.22% 78.33% Percent 60.97% 22.26% 83.24%
Variance Clients 762 -207 555 Variance Units 3,938 1,141 5,080
Percent 27.45% -7.45% 20.00% Percent 19.31% 5.60% 24.90%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category within tolerance. 1 Fiscal:
Program: Providers have performed at 44 percent of projected client goal and 21 percent of service goal. Program:
Fiscal: Variance has improved since the 5-month ESD. 2 Fiscal:
Program: Providers have performed at 69 percent of projected client goal and 61 percent of service goal. Program:
Funding Adjustments Reprogramming Date Amount Date Amount
September 01, 2006 $2,000 September 01, 2006 $15,000
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2006 $18,975,908   $345,362 $347,362 1.83% $174,549 $172,813
2005   $17,144,692 $291,460 $291,460 1.70% $278,740 $12,720
2004   $17,811,946 $308,147 $308,147 1.73% $304,383 $3,764
2003   $19,461,123 $340,570 $343,807 1.77% $337,397 $6,410
2002   $16,137,634 $292,562 $301,714 1.87% $299,363 $2,351
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2006 2,778 2,176 -602 $80 96.0% 39.0%
2005 1,753 2,299 546 $121 95.0% 38.3%
2004 3,291 3,529 238 $86 89.0% 36.5%
2003 3,641 3,818 177 $88 83.9% 39.7%
2002 1,621 3,066 1,445 $97 87.2% 37.3%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 37 percent of the 422 respondents reporting a need for Case Management (Non-medical) said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 2,706
Est. percent of need met: 63%
Est. clients needing service: 4,295
Clients served (2006): 2,176
Est. clients not served (2006): 2,119
Cost per client (2006): $80
Cost to meet need:    $169,520 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $347,362
Baltimore City, Additional Funding $394,923
Baltimore City, Ryan White Part B $251,906
Baltimore County, Ryan White Part B $146,413
Anne Arundel County, Ryan White Part B $100,678
Howard County, Ryan White Part B $23,064
Queen Anne’s County, Ryan White Part B $16,807
Queen Anne's RW Part B $9,365



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $187,813
FY 2007 Info EMA Award: $16,308,921

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.