Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Substance-abuse Treatment — Residential Scorecard Archive
Substance-abuse Treatment — Residential — EMA Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2007 $16,308,921 $415,140 $0 $415,140 2.55% $0 $415,140
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Dates in Period 8/08-0/08 1/08-2/08 8/08-2/08
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Projected Dollars $172,975 $69,190 $242,165
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $81,575 $74,049 $155,624
Percent 19.65% 17.84% 37.49%
Variance Dollars $-91,400 $4,859 $-86,541
Percent -22.02% 1.17% -20.85%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Projected Clients 45 18 63 Projected Units 7,285 2,914 10,199
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 34 39 73 Actual Units 3,415 2,586 6,001
Percent 31.48% 36.11% 67.59% Percent 19.53% 14.79% 34.32%
Variance Clients -11 21 10 Variance Units -3,870 -328 -4,198
Percent -10.19% 19.44% 9.26% Percent -22.13% -1.88% -24.01%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
Fiscal: 2 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2007 $16,308,921   $415,140 $415,140 2.55% $155,624 $259,516
2006   $18,975,908 $409,880 $424,880 2.24% $405,392 $19,488
2005   $17,144,692 $334,321 $379,321 2.21% $338,896 $40,425
2004   $17,811,946 $329,521 $205,221 1.15% $374,680 $-169,459
2003   $19,461,123 $342,516 $461,604 2.37% $409,568 $52,036
2002   $16,137,634 $1,078,715 $1,425,879 8.84% $1,401,911 $23,968
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2007 108 73 -35 $2,131 87.0% 36.0%
2006 111 152 41 $2,667 93.0% 30.0%
2005 69 135 66 $2,510 91.9% 28.9%
2004 54 126 72 $2,973 87.3% 23.8%
2003 78 88 10 $4,654 70.5% 15.9%
2002 914 $1,533 74.1% 38.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 21 percent of the 284 respondents reporting a need for Substance-abuse Treatment — Residential said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 152
Est. percent of need met: 79%
Est. clients needing service: 192
Clients served (2007): 73
Est. clients not served (2007): 119
Cost per client (2007): $2,131
Cost to meet need:    $253,589 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $415,140



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $259,516
FY 2008 Info Rank: S8 EMA Award: $15,625,276

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.