Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Mental Health Services Scorecard Archive
Mental Health Services — Counties Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking County Set Aside Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Set Aside Carryover Total Alloc.
2008 $2,411,806 $152,711 $0 $152,711 6.33% $0 $152,711
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Dates in Period 8/09-0/09 1/09-2/09 3/09-7/09 8/09-7/09
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Projected Dollars $63,630 $25,452 $63,630 $152,711
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $62,888 $25,154 $64,669 $152,711
Percent 41.18% 16.47% 42.35% 100.00%
Variance Dollars $-742 $-298 $1,039 $0
Percent -0.49% -0.20% 0.68% 0.00%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08   Units Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Projected Clients 85 34 85 203 Projected Units 562 225 562 1,349
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 105 45 1 151 Actual Units 468 723 -17 1,174
Percent 51.72% 22.17% 0.49% 74.38% Percent 34.69% 53.60% -1.26% 87.03%
Variance Clients 20 11 -84 -52 Variance Units -94 498 -579 -175
Percent 10.06% 5.50% -41.17% -25.62% Percent -6.97% 36.93% -42.93% -12.97%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category supercedes client projections by 19 percent. Category met 75 percent of unit projections. 1 Fiscal: What TA is being provided to under-performing providers?
Program: Grantee assisting under-performing providers. Majority of new intakes occur at beginning of fiscal year. Program: Should client and unit projections be adjusted?
Fiscal: 2 Fiscal:
Program: Technical assistance provided for appointment-reminder systems and transportation — kept-appointment rate improved. Program:
Fiscal: Category expended all funds. Zero percent variance. 3 Fiscal: The category expended all funds.
Program: There were 65 unduplicated clients accessing multiple counseling sessions. Program: Category served fewer clients than projected.
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY County Set Aside Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Set Aside Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2008 $2,411,806   $152,711 $152,711 6.33% $152,711 $0
2007   $2,470,676 $159,560 $159,560 6.46% $159,560 $0
2006   $2,489,638 $165,498 $165,498 6.65% $153,888 $11,610
2005   $2,259,670 $150,042 $161,042 7.13% $126,918 $34,124
2004   $2,318,536 $155,881 $168,881 7.28% $137,364 $31,517
2003   $2,777,911 $161,846 $178,179 6.41% $138,508 $39,671
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2008 203 151 -52 $1,011 50.0% 44.0%
2007 208 211 3 $756 53.0% 46.0%
2006 178 183 5 $840 55.0% 46.0%
2005 160 137 -23 $926 68.0% 38.0%
2004 79 156 77 $880 64.0% 35.0%
2003 186 199 13 $696 61.0% 37.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on Mental Health Services available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2008.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A Counties $152,711
(RW Part A EMA) $542,289
Baltimore City, Ryan White Part B. $421,640



RW Part A Counties
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $0
Performance Summary:
Category expended all funds but served fewer clients than projected. Most of the clients were reported in the first reporting period.
Compared to Last Year:
Providers served far fewer clients than in FY 2007.
Unmet Need:
Mental health care is critical and serves to address the co-morbid conditions of clients with HIV/AIDS.
Questions:
What caused the significant decrease in clients between FY 2007 and FY 2008? Did category need more funds at year's end to meet client projections?
Comments:
Did the category run out of funds toward the end of the year, leading to a decrease in number of clients?
FY 2009 Info Rank: M3 County Set Aside: $2,334,014 Allocation: $132,686 (5.68% of Set Aside)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.