Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Outreach Services Scorecard Archive
Outreach Services — Counties Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking County Set Aside Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Set Aside Carryover Total Alloc.
2008 $2,411,806 $103,556 $0 $103,556 4.29% $0 $103,556
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Dates in Period 8/09-0/09 1/09-2/09 3/09-7/09 8/09-7/09
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Projected Dollars $43,148 $17,259 $43,148 $103,556
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $43,148 $9,802 $47,800 $100,750
Percent 41.67% 9.47% 46.16% 97.29%
Variance Dollars $0 $-7,457 $4,652 $-2,806
Percent 0.00% -7.20% 4.49% -2.71%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08 [There are no unit-level data for this category.]
Projected Clients 16 7 16 39
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 9 0 16 25
Percent 23.08% 0.00% 41.03% 64.10%
Variance Clients -7 -7 0 -14
Percent -18.59% -16.67% -0.64% -35.90%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category did not achieve projected goals for clients or specific activities. 1 Fiscal: What TA is being provided?
Program: Administrative agent will monitor this category closely and continue to provide technical assistance in this area. Program: Adjustment to projections may be needed.
Fiscal: Category expended 51.13 percent of funds. 2 Fiscal: Should money be moved?
Program: Testing has not rendered the amount of HIV+ persons anticipated; focus should switch to PLWHAs lost from care. Program: Which outreach strategies were provided through technical assistance? What are the new strategies for reengaging PLWHAs lost, back into care?
Fiscal: Category performed within tolerance. 3 Fiscal: Category expended 97 percent of funds.
Program: Initial outreach strategies were unsuccessful. Program changed strategies and paired outreach workers with disease intervention specialists (DIS), which improved outcomes. Program: Number of clients who kept follow-up appointments for PMC as well as case management are significantly lower than projected.
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY County Set Aside Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Set Aside Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2008 $2,411,806   $103,556 $103,556 4.29% $100,750 $2,806
2007   $2,470,676 $106,453 $106,453 4.31% $131,453 $-25,000
2006   $2,489,638 $87,449 $87,449 3.51% $74,477 $12,972
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2008 39 25 -14 $4,030 72.0% 44.0%
2007 35 37 2 $3,552 89.0% 30.0%
2006 49 45 -4 $1,655 56.0% 33.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 42 percent of the 393 respondents reporting a need for Outreach Services said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 45
Est. percent of need met: 58%
Est. clients needing service: 77
Clients served (2008): 25
Est. clients not served (2008): 52
Cost per client (2008): $4,030
Cost to meet need:    $209,560 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A Counties $103,556
(RW Part A EMA) $925,128
MAI (EMA and Counties) $425,380
Infectious Disease and Environmental Health Administration. Minority AIDS Initiative. $325,109



RW Part A Counties
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $2,806
Performance Summary:
The category served fewer clients than projected and nearly expended all funds.
Compared to Last Year:
The category overperformed in clients, underperformed in service units and expended all funds.
Unmet Need:
Questions:
What outreach model is being used?
Comments:
The number of clients engaged in care is low. What changes are needed to outreach programs to successfully engage clients in care?
FY 2009 Info Rank: S3 County Set Aside: $2,334,014 Allocation: $116,787 (5.00% of Set Aside)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.