Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) Scorecard Archive
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) — Counties Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking County Set Aside Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Set Aside Carryover Total Alloc.
2007 $2,470,676 $775,071 $0 $775,071 31.37% $0 $775,071
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Dates in Period 8/08-0/08 1/08-2/08 8/08-2/08
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Projected Dollars $322,946 $129,179 $452,125
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $37,174 $112,350 $149,524
Percent 4.80% 14.50% 19.29%
Variance Dollars $-285,772 $-16,829 $-302,601
Percent -36.87% -2.17% -39.04%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Projected Clients 146 58 204 Projected Units 346 138 484
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 155 34 189 Actual Units 285 18 303
Percent 44.29% 9.71% 54.00% Percent 34.34% 2.17% 36.51%
Variance Clients 9 -24 -15 Variance Units -61 -120 -181
Percent 2.62% -6.95% -4.33% Percent -7.33% -14.50% -21.83%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category expended less than 1 percent of funds. Two providers failed to report. 1 Fiscal: Difficult to plan with such significant under reporting.
Program: Category performed at 40 percent of clients projected and 21 percent of projected service units. Program: Category in target with client actuals and under performing in service units.
Fiscal: Twenty-four percent of funds were expended. 2 Fiscal: Should money be moved from category? It is currently not meeting expenditure target.
Program: Forty-four percent of projected clients were served and 37 percent of service units provided. Program: Client projections changed since last report (was 350 clients, now 827). What happenned?
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY County Set Aside Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Set Aside Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2007 $2,470,676   $775,071 $775,071 31.37% $149,524 $625,547
2006   $2,489,638 $716,767 $716,767 28.79% $684,898 $31,869
2005   $2,259,670 $592,937 $592,937 26.24% $588,916 $4,021
2004   $2,318,536 $595,120 $613,642 26.47% $611,090 $2,552
2003   $2,777,911 $624,805 $699,130 25.17% $699,071 $59
2002   $2,133,804 $525,000 $525,000 24.60% $525,000 $0
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2007 350 189 -161 $791 56.0% 42.0%
2006 405 381 -24 $1,797 61.0% 42.0%
2005 393 311 -82 $1,893 55.9% 38.9%
2004 778 420 -358 $1,454 48.1% 36.2%
2003 914 913 -1 $765 60.4% 39.1%
2002 450 636 186 $825 71.7% 44.2%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2007.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A Counties $775,071
(RW Part A EMA) $4,142,096
DHMH, Medical Assistance, AIDS HealthChoice Enrollment $67,194,472
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice Disabled Enrollment $16,612,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice FAC Enrollment $3,794,395
DHMH, Infectious Disease and Environmental Health Administration. $2,900,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV/AIDS Primary Adult Care (PAC) Enrollment $2,021,104
Baltimore City RW Part B $1,413,044
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants $1,113,985
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants. $1,017,362
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early intervention. $603,827
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early. $603,748
Represents two RW Part C-funded program (not an aggregate of all Part C programs for this service). $440,629
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $184,660
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $177,891
Baltimore Co. RW Part B $109,208



RW Part A Counties
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $625,547
FY 2008 Info Rank: M1 County Set Aside: $2,411,806

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.