Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Substance-abuse Treatment — Residential Scorecard Archive
Substance-abuse Treatment — Residential — EMA Period 1 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2009 S11 $17,433,707 $258,429 $0 $258,429 1.48% $0 $258,429
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 YTD FY09
Dates in Period 8/9-0/9 8/9-0/9
Months in Period 5 5
Expenditures Period 1 YTD FY09
Projected Dollars $107,679 $107,679
Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Dollars $98,194 $98,194
Percent 38.00% 38.00%
Variance Dollars $-9,485 $-9,485
Percent -3.67% -3.67%
Clients Period 1 YTD FY09 [There are no unit-level data for this category.]
Projected Clients 28 28
Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Clients 42 42
Percent 62.50% 62.50%
Variance Clients 14 14
Percent 20.83% 20.83%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Within tolerance. 1 Fiscal: Within tolerance.
Program: Increased number of clients attributed to better referral and linkages among providers. Program: More clients are being seen for the 28-day programs. Why are unit actuals so different from projections?
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2009 $17,433,707   $258,429 $258,429 1.48% $98,194 $160,235
2008   $15,625,276 $420,963 $420,963 2.69% $404,293 $16,670
2007   $16,308,921 $415,140 $350,805 2.15% $335,894 $14,911
2006   $18,975,908 $409,880 $424,880 2.24% $405,392 $19,488
2005   $17,144,692 $334,321 $379,321 2.21% $338,896 $40,425
2004   $17,811,946 $329,521 $205,221 1.15% $374,680 $-169,459
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2009 67 42 -25 $2,337 90.0%
2008 117 133 16 $3,039 98.0% 30.0%
2007 108 123 15 $2,730 91.0% 32.0%
2006 111 152 41 $2,667 93.0% 30.0%
2005 69 135 66 $2,510 91.9% 28.9%
2004 54 126 72 $2,973 87.3% 23.8%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2010) consumer survey 38 percent of the 105 respondents reporting a need for Substance-abuse Treatment — Residential said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2009): 85
Est. percent of need met: 62%
Est. clients needing service: 137
Clients served (2009): 42
Est. clients not served (2009): 95
Cost per client (2009): $2,337
Cost to meet need:    $222,015 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $258,429



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $160,235
FY 2010 Info Rank: S6 EMA Award: $16,870,407

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.