Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity Scorecard Archive
OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity — EMA (MAI) Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2008 M1 $1,879,856 $449,752 $20,341 $470,093 25.01% $0 $470,093
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Dates in Period 3/08-7/08 8/08-9/08 10/08-2/09 3/08-2/09
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Projected Dollars $195,872 $78,349 $195,872 $470,093
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $185,893 $163,960 $118,919 $468,772
Percent 39.54% 34.88% 25.30% 99.72%
Variance Dollars $-9,979 $85,611 $-76,953 $-1,321
Percent -2.12% 18.21% -16.37% -0.28%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08   Units Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY08
Projected Clients 83 33 83 200 Projected Units 1,417 567 1,417 3,400
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 147 34 48 229 Actual Units 2,584 992 1,877 5,453
Percent 73.50% 17.00% 24.00% 114.50% Percent 76.00% 29.18% 55.21% 160.38%
Variance Clients 64 1 -35 29 Variance Units 1,167 425 460 2,053
Percent 31.83% 0.33% -17.67% 14.50% Percent 34.33% 12.51% 13.54% 60.38%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
Fiscal: 2 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
Fiscal: This category received $20,341 in funding during the 5-month reprogramming exercise. 3 Fiscal: This category expended all funds.
Program: Outcome measures for this category were not reached; 60 percent of clients (out of a target of 70 percent) had improved or stable CD4 counts; 65 percent had improved or stable viral load counts. Poor adherence to PMC appointments is cited as the reason. Program: Was the increase in total clients a factor in failing to meet target outcome measures? What are the reasons that newer patients are more adherent than older patients?
Funding Adjustments Reprogramming Date Amount
February 01, 2008 $20,341
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2008 $1,879,856   $449,752 $470,093 25.01% $468,772 $1,321
2007   $1,785,032 $358,970 $358,970 20.11% $353,333 $5,637
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2008 200 229 29 $2,047 92.0% 38.0%
2007 179 149 -30 $2,371 94.0% 46.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2008.
Other Funding Streams
RW MAI EMA $470,093



RW MAI EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $1,321
Performance Summary:
The category expended on target but utilized far more funding than expected in the second reporting period. This category also had a much higher service utilization rate than projected.
Compared to Last Year:
This service category received increased funding in FY 2008 and provided more service units to more clients than in FY 2007.
Unmet Need:
Co-morbid conditions of substance abuse, mental health and others continue to be prevalent among PLWH/As in this EMA.
Questions:
Did providers have to make cutbacks in the third period due to high expenditure in the second period? Did this effect service provision?
Comments:
FY 2009 client and service utilization totals should be high according to FY 2008 data. This should be considered in planning for FY 2010.
FY 2009 Info EMA Award: $1,920,262 Allocation: $431,510 (22.47% of Award)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.