Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Child Care Services Scorecard Archive
Child Care Services — EMA (MAI) Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2009 $1,920,262 $41,468 $0 $41,468 2.16% $0 $41,468
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY09
Dates in Period 3/09-7/09 8/09-9/09 3/09-9/09
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY09
Projected Dollars $17,278 $6,911 $24,190
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $6,621 $2,145 $8,766
Percent 15.97% 5.17% 21.14%
Variance Dollars $-10,657 $-4,766 $-15,424
Percent -25.70% -11.49% -37.19%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY09   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY09
Projected Clients 9 3 12 Projected Units 214 86 300
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 48 4 52 Actual Units 68 55 123
Percent 233.33% 19.44% 252.78% Percent 13.22% 10.69% 23.92%
Variance Clients 39 1 40 Variance Units -146 -31 -177
Percent 191.67% 2.78% 194.44% Percent -28.44% -5.97% -34.42%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: The calculation of a service unit for child care services is based on a flat daily rate of $72. The provider is expected to expend all funds by the end of the fiscal year due to a new agreement with a primarily medical care provider. 1 Fiscal: Will there be an increase in expenditures to this category due to the expansion of services to a primary medical care provider?
Program: The provider expanded to an additional site that is open once a week which has increased the total number of clients served. Program: What are the reasons unit projections are well below unit actuals?
Fiscal: The category is underspending at the seven-month period 2 Fiscal: Reports shows 45 HIV positive parents/guardians with 52 total children served-indicating multiple children for some clients. Does it cost the same to provide child care to a client who has five children as it does a client with one?
Program: The number of clients served is higher than projected. Services were expanded to include an additional satellite location. Program: Did the category meet client goals? Client projections not listed in report (the HIV-positive parent/guardian is the client). What is one unit of service? Units reported in ESD suggest one unit is tied to the number of children seen; but the $72 flat rate
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2009 $1,920,262   $41,468 $41,468 2.16% $8,766 $32,702
2008   $1,879,856 $132,629 $132,629 7.06% $132,629 $0
2007   $1,785,032 $125,939 $125,939 7.06% $121,409 $4,530
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2009 20 52 32 $168 95.0% 84.0%
2008 42 51 9 $2,600
2007 47 51 4 $2,380 4.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2010) consumer survey 86 percent of the 36 respondents reporting a need for Child Care Services said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2009): 71
Est. percent of need met: 14%
Est. clients needing service: 507
Clients served (2009): 52
Est. clients not served (2009): 455
Cost per client (2009): $168
Cost to meet need:    $76,440 
Other Funding Streams
RW MAI EMA $41,468



RW MAI EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $32,702
FY 2010 Info EMA Award: $1,655,104 Allocation: $25,828 (1.56% of Award)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.