Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Child Care Services Scorecard Archive
Child Care Services — EMA (MAI) Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2008 S2 $1,879,856 $132,629 $0 $132,629 7.06% $0 $132,629
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08
Dates in Period 3/08-7/08 8/08-2/09 3/08-2/09
Months in Period 5 7 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08
Projected Dollars $55,262 $77,367 $132,629
Percent 41.67% 58.33% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $57,578 $22,432 $80,010
Percent 43.41% 16.91% 60.33%
Variance Dollars $2,316 $-54,935 $-52,619
Percent 1.75% -41.42% -39.67%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY08
Projected Clients 20 27 47 Projected Units 182 254 436
Percent 41.67% 58.33% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 58.33% 100.00%
Actual Clients 31 2 33 Actual Units 32 8 40
Percent 65.96% 4.26% 70.21% Percent 7.34% 1.83% 9.17%
Variance Clients 11 -25 -14 Variance Units -150 -246 -396
Percent 24.29% -54.08% -29.79% Percent -34.33% -56.50% -90.83%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
Fiscal: 2 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2008 $1,879,856   $132,629 $132,629 7.06% $80,010 $52,619
2007   $1,785,032 $125,939 $125,939 7.06% $121,409 $4,530
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2008 47 33 -14 $2,424
2007 47 51 4 $2,380 4.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
There are no data from the relevant survey year.
Other Funding Streams
RW MAI EMA $132,629



RW MAI EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $52,619
FY 2009 Info EMA Award: $1,920,262 Allocation: $41,420 (2.16% of Award)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.