Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Food Bank/Home-delivered Meals Scorecard Archive
Food Bank/Home-delivered Meals — Counties Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking County Set Aside Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Set Aside Carryover Total Alloc.
2009 S7 $2,334,014 $190,788 $0 $190,788 8.17% $0 $190,788
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY09
Dates in Period 8/9-0/9 1/9-2/9 3/9-7/9 8/9-7/9
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY09
Projected Dollars $79,495 $31,798 $79,495 $190,788
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $75,840 $33,485 $81,427 $190,752
Percent 39.75% 17.55% 42.68% 99.98%
Variance Dollars $-3,655 $1,687 $1,932 $-36
Percent -1.92% 0.88% 1.01% -0.02%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY09   Units Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY09
Projected Clients 207 83 207 497 Projected Units 13,178 5,271 13,178 31,628
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 0 0 487 487 Actual Units 0 0 33,509 33,509
Percent 0.00% 0.00% 97.99% 97.99% Percent 0.00% 0.00% 105.95% 105.95%
Variance Clients -207 -83 280 -10 Variance Units -13,178 -5,271 20,331 1,881
Percent -41.67% -16.67% 56.32% -2.01% Percent -41.67% -16.67% 64.28% 5.95%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Within tolerance. 1 Fiscal: Within tolerance.
Program: Technical assistance provided to ensure correct tracking of services. Program: Are clients receiving services as prescribed? Client actuals doubled in two measures, but with little to no increase in units served at 5-month period.
Fiscal: No comment. 2 Fiscal: Within tolerance.
Program: There are no waiting lists within this category. Program: With higher-than-projected client levels, will additional funding be necessary for the winter season? Why are liquid supplements being utilized more than expected?
Fiscal: Category expended all funds. $170,788 went for the provision of bags groceries, nutritional supplements, and frozen meals; $20,00 went to food vouchers with a small amount allocated to nutritional supplements. 3 Fiscal: This category performed within tolerance.
Program: Client projections were on target with actual clients served. No wait-list was reported for this category. Program: Client actuals for liquid supplements were higher than projected. Is there an increased need for liquid supplements?
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY County Set Aside Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Set Aside Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2009 $2,334,014   $190,788 $190,788 8.17% $190,752 $36
2008   $2,411,806 $168,727 $169,727 7.04% $169,126 $601
2007   $2,470,676 $164,598 $164,598 6.66% $164,598 $0
2006   $2,489,638 $162,324 $162,324 6.52% $187,624 $-25,300
2005   $2,259,670 $182,581 $182,581 8.08% $182,581 $0
2004   $2,318,536 $189,687 $208,944 9.01% $187,187 $21,757
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2009 497 487 -10 $391 67.0% 37.0%
2008 517 597 80 $283 72.0% 50.0%
2007 272 367 95 $448 67.0% 46.0%
2006 160 151 -9 $1,242 70.0% 46.0%
2005 209 250 41 $730 73.2% 33.2%
2004 277 233 -44 $803 66.1% 29.6%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2010) consumer survey 43 percent of the 113 respondents reporting a need for Food Bank/Home-delivered Meals said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2009): 487
Est. percent of need met: 57%
Est. clients needing service: 854
Clients served (2009): 487
Est. clients not served (2009): 367
Cost per client (2009): $391
Cost to meet need:    $143,497 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A Counties $190,788
(RW Part A EMA) $233,816
MAI (EMA and Counties) $101,616



RW Part A Counties
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $36
Performance Summary:
This category performed within tolerance for the entire fiscal year.
Compared to Last Year:
The category received an increase in total allocation from FY 2008 and expended all but $38, compared with $601 unexpended in FY 2008.
Unmet Need:
Questions:
Is there an increased need for liquid supplements? The utilization of liquid supplements surpassed projections throughout FY 2009.
Comments:
Could category absorb additional funding next year? FY 2010 was the first year that unduplicated client and unit data were given; duplicated data were used in previous years.
FY 2010 Info Rank: S4 County Set Aside: $2,355,903 Allocation: $175,788 (7.46% of Set Aside)

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.