Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) Scorecard Archive
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) — EMA Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc. + Carryover
2006 $18,975,908 $4,271,116 $-62,540 $4,208,576 22.18% $64,820 $4,273,396
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06
Dates in Period 8/07-0/07 1/07-2/07 3/07-7/07 8/07-7/07
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06
Projected Dollars $1,780,582 $712,233 $1,780,582 $4,273,396
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $912,252 $866,177 $2,383,958 $4,162,387
Percent 21.35% 20.27% 55.79% 97.40%
Variance Dollars $-868,330 $153,944 $603,376 $-111,009
Percent -20.32% 3.60% 14.12% -2.60%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06   Units Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY06
Projected Clients 2,068 827 2,068 4,962 Projected Units 9,850 3,940 9,850 23,641
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 3,008 245 961 4,214 Actual Units 9,979 3,176 11,030 24,185
Percent 60.62% 4.94% 19.37% 84.93% Percent 42.21% 13.43% 46.66% 102.30%
Variance Clients 940 -582 -1,107 -748 Variance Units 129 -764 1,180 544
Percent 18.95% -11.73% -22.30% -15.07% Percent 0.54% -3.23% 4.99% 2.30%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Six contracts not included, if included still under spending. 1 Fiscal: Difficult to plan and analyze when 13 percent of funds is not really accounted for and 40 percent contracts not included.
Program: Over performing for clients, meeting unit goals. Program: Spending and performance are similar to FY 2005 pattern for first period.
Fiscal: Three providers with four contracts have not reported, representing $326,708. 2 Fiscal: Historically leaves about $100,000, consider reducing by $50,000.
Program: Performance units and client goals are being met. Program: When will technical assistance be completed so that actual numbers of pap smears will begin showing up?
Fiscal: Spent 97 percent of funds with two reductions (totaling $62,540) and $64,820 in added carryover. 3 Fiscal: Why add and subtract funds to category in same three month period? Category historically returns money.
Program: Met 85 percent of projected clients, but exceeded office visit units. Program: Implementation of Medicaid PAC reduced clients overall.
Funding Adjustments Reprogramming Date Amount Date Amount
December 01, 2006 $-62,540 September 01, 2006 $64,820
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2006 $18,975,908   $4,271,116 $4,208,576 22.18% $4,162,387 $46,189
2005   $17,144,692 $3,801,530 $3,698,985 21.58% $3,607,428 $91,557
2004   $17,811,946 $3,949,585 $3,983,585 22.36% $3,881,617 $101,968
2003   $19,461,123 $4,847,766 $4,854,590 24.95% $4,743,406 $111,184
2002   $16,137,634 $4,071,928 $4,640,157 28.75% $4,359,510 $280,647
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2006 4,962 4,214 -748 $987 80.0% 42.0%
2005 4,386 4,309 -77 $837 82.0% 33.5%
2004 4,637 4,581 -56 $847 83.0% 33.9%
2003 5,300 5,184 -116 $915 74.5% 32.1%
2002 3,337 3,714 377 $1,173 82.6% 34.6%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2006.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $4,208,576
DHMH, Medical Assistance, AIDS HealthChoice Enrollment $67,194,472
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice Disabled Enrollment $16,612,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice FAC Enrollment $3,794,395
DHMH, Infectious Disease and Environmental Health Administration. $2,900,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV/AIDS Primary Adult Care (PAC) Enrollment $2,021,104
Baltimore City RW Part B $1,413,044
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants $1,113,985
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants. $1,017,362
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early intervention. $603,827
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early. $603,748
Represents two RW Part C-funded program (not an aggregate of all Part C programs for this service). $440,629
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $184,660
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $177,891
Baltimore Co. RW Part B $109,208



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $111,009
Performance Summary:
Overall client numbers for 2005 and 2006 between 4,200 and 4,300. New clients make up 22 percent of total.
Compared to Last Year:
Received $574,000 more in 2006. Projected more clients for 2006. Actual clients in 2006 were 95 less than 2005 achievement.
Unmet Need:
97 percent acknowledged need for outpatient ambulatory medical services, only three could not receive them.
Questions:
More Ryan White clients may be enrolled in PAC or MHIP or other insurance programs. Planning council will need to evaluate the impact of these on all Ryan White medical programs.
Comments:
Pap tests ar 62 percent, improved over past years and 111 percent follow-up colposcopies. 41 percent of new clients received new Hep C screening.
FY 2007 Info EMA Award: $16,308,921

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.