Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County • Baltimore City • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Harford County • Howard County • Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Food Bank/Home-delivered Meals Scorecard Archive
Food Bank/Home-delivered Meals — EMA Period 1 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2007 $16,308,921 $170,078 $0 $170,078 1.04% $0 $170,078
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 YTD FY07
Dates in Period 8/08-0/08 8/08-0/08
Months in Period 5 5
Expenditures Period 1 YTD FY07
Projected Dollars $70,866 $70,866
Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Dollars $64,920 $64,920
Percent 38.17% 38.17%
Variance Dollars $-5,946 $-5,946
Percent -3.50% -3.50%
Clients Period 1 YTD FY07   Units Period 1 YTD FY07
Projected Clients 58 58 Projected Units 13,367 13,367
Percent 41.67% 41.67% Percent 41.67% 41.67%
Actual Clients 120 120 Actual Units 11,423 11,423
Percent 86.33% 86.33% Percent 35.61% 35.61%
Variance Clients 62 62 Variance Units -1,944 -1,944
Percent 44.66% 44.66% Percent -6.06% -6.06%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal:
Program: Program:
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2007 $16,308,921   $170,078 $170,078 1.04% $64,920 $105,158
2006   $18,975,908 $333,976 $394,202 2.08% $408,134 $-13,932
2005   $17,144,692 $334,321 $334,321 1.95% $334,281 $40
2004   $17,811,946 $347,333 $351,333 1.97% $400,841 $-49,508
2003   $19,461,123 $393,115 $413,115 2.12% $398,052 $15,063
2002   $16,137,634 $327,694 $365,435 2.26% $364,542 $893
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client 		Af.-Am.
Percent 		WICY
Percent
2007 139 120 -19 $541
2006 826 1,120 294 $364 93.0% 51.0%
2005 913 1,045 132 $319 85.0% 32.0%
2004 1,343 1,446 103 $277 85.0% 33.5%
2003 1,150 1,414 264 $281 75.7% 31.6%
2002 677 803 126 $453 91.8% 48.6%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2007) consumer survey 48 percent of the 80 respondents reporting a need for Food Bank/Home-delivered Meals said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2006): 1,120
Est. percent of need met: 52%
Est. clients needing service: 2,153
Clients served (2007): 120
Est. clients not served (2007): 2,033
Cost per client (2007): $541
Cost to meet need:    $1,099,853 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $170,078
MAI (EMA and Counties) $185,643



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $105,158
FY 2008 Info Rank: S14 EMA Award: $15,625,276

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.