Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Mental Health Services Scorecard Archive
Mental Health Services — Counties Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking County Set Aside Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Set Aside Carryover Total Alloc.
2010 M3 $2,355,903 $140,833 $0 $140,833 5.98% $0 $140,833
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10
Dates in Period 8/10-0/10 1/10-2/10 8/10-2/10
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10
Projected Dollars $58,680 $23,472 $82,153
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $35,452 $17,491 $52,943
Percent 25.17% 12.42% 37.59%
Variance Dollars $-23,228 $-5,981 $-29,210
Percent -16.49% -4.25% -20.74%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10
Projected Clients 58 23 81 Projected Units 377 151 528
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 0 166 166 Actual Units 0 738 738
Percent 0.00% 119.55% 119.55% Percent 0.00% 81.53% 81.53%
Variance Clients -58 143 85 Variance Units -377 587 210
Percent -41.67% 102.88% 61.21% Percent -41.67% 64.87% 23.20%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: There are no vacancies in this program. The category expended 99.1% of funding in fiscal year 2009. 1 Fiscal: not within tolerance. Variance is 16.51%
Program: 31% of clients were reported new to the providing agency this period. Program: Is this an explanation for the high number of clients receiving individual counseling sessions with a licensed mental health professional?
Fiscal: Unspent funds and the high variance level is the result of programs that have not submitted invoices or reported encumbered expenditures. 2 Fiscal: With a variance of 20.75 percent at the seven-month period, this category is under spent. Will the variance be altered when reporting is submitted?
Program: At 7 months, number of client equals 99 percent of clients served in FY 2009. Program: Are providers salary based or fee for service or both? Will category be able to expend all funds by year end?
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY County Set Aside Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Set Aside Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2010 $2,355,903   $140,833 $140,833 5.98% $52,943 $87,890
2009   $2,334,014 $132,686 $132,686 5.68% $131,496 $1,190
2008   $2,411,806 $152,711 $152,711 6.33% $152,711 $0
2007   $2,470,676 $159,560 $159,560 6.46% $159,560 $0
2006   $2,489,638 $165,498 $165,498 6.65% $153,888 $11,610
2005   $2,259,670 $150,042 $161,042 7.13% $126,918 $34,124
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2010 138 166 28 $318 40.0% 44.0%
2009 173 168 -5 $782 45.0% 39.0%
2008 203 151 -52 $1,011 50.0% 44.0%
2007 208 211 3 $756 53.0% 46.0%
2006 178 183 5 $840 55.0% 46.0%
2005 160 137 -23 $926 68.0% 38.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2010) consumer survey 15 percent of the 461 respondents reporting a need for Mental Health Services said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2009): 168
Est. percent of need met: 85%
Est. clients needing service: 197
Clients served (2010): 166
Est. clients not served (2010): 31
Cost per client (2010): $318
Cost to meet need:    $9,858 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A Counties $140,833
(RW Part A EMA) $603,365
MAI (EMA and Counties) $111,100
Baltimore City, Ryan White Part B. $421,640



RW Part A Counties
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $87,890
FY 2011 Info County Set Aside: $2,253,517

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.