Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Housing Services Scorecard Archive
Housing Services — EMA Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2010 S2 $16,870,407 $968,560 $90,000 $1,058,560 6.27% $0 $1,058,560
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10
Dates in Period 8/10-0/10 1/10-2/10 8/10-2/10
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10
Projected Dollars $441,067 $176,427 $617,493
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $443,523 $152,966 $596,489
Percent 41.90% 14.45% 56.35%
Variance Dollars $2,456 $-23,461 $-21,004
Percent 0.23% -2.22% -1.98%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY10
Projected Clients 101 40 141 Projected Units 7,451 2,981 10,432
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 181 46 227 Actual Units 8,950 3,115 12,065
Percent 74.88% 19.03% 93.91% Percent 50.05% 17.42% 67.46%
Variance Clients 80 6 86 Variance Units 1,499 134 1,633
Percent 33.22% 2.36% 35.58% Percent 8.38% 0.75% 9.13%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Recommendation to increase funding by $90,000; supplemental funds needed in fall and winter months. 1 Fiscal:
Program: Average client spends 49 days in transitional housing Program:
Fiscal: This category received $90,000 at the 5 month reporting period. The category is expending at 56.35 percent rate at the seven-month period. 2 Fiscal: This category is under spent with a variance of 1.98 percent.
Program: One additional program was funded this year to provide emergency financial assistance. Of funds expended, 76 percent funded bed nights; 11 percent to rental vouchers; 13 percent to utilities. Program: Is the $90,000 reflected in this report? Could this category be a candidate for additional funds in anticipation of higher seasonal demand for service?
Funding Adjustments Reprogramming Date Amount
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2010 $16,870,407   $968,560 $1,058,560 6.27% $596,489 $462,071
2009   $17,433,707 $789,895 $827,895 4.75% $789,895 $38,000
2008   $15,625,276 $859,697 $943,326 6.04% $942,045 $1,281
2007   $16,308,921 $737,008 $747,616 4.58% $926,974 $-179,358
2006   $18,975,908 $764,729 $732,086 3.86% $783,439 $-51,353
2005   $17,144,692 $675,501 $675,501 3.94% $726,377 $-50,876
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2010 241 227 -14 $2,627 93.0% 49.0%
2009 207 220 13 $3,590 75.0% 32.0%
2008 509 530 21 $1,777 96.0% 51.0%
2007 458 557 99 $1,664 97.0% 45.8%
2006 510 518 8 $1,512 100.0% 47.0%
2005 615 572 -43 $1,269 88.1% 38.6%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2010) consumer survey 53 percent of the 268 respondents reporting a need for Housing Services said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2009): 220
Est. percent of need met: 47%
Est. clients needing service: 468
Clients served (2010): 227
Est. clients not served (2010): 241
Cost per client (2010): $2,627
Cost to meet need:    $633,107 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $1,058,560
City of Baltimore, HOPWA. $6,336,671
Baltimore County, HOPWA. $911,994
Health Care for the Homeless, Inc., Connect HOPWA. $427,978
Housing Commission of Anne Arundel County, HOPWA. $313,592
Anne Arundel, HOPWA. $271,586
Health Care for the Homeless, Inc., Capital HOPWA. $250,000
Howard County HOPWA. $96,443
Harford County, HOPWA. $92,060
Harford County, HOPWA $87,842
Howard County HOPWA. $83,961
Health Care for the Homeless, Inc., HOPWA. $25,000



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $462,071
FY 2011 Info EMA Award: $16,164,474

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.