Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Mental Health Services Scorecard Archive
Mental Health Services — EMA (MAI) Period 1 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2010 $1,655,104 $111,100 $0 $111,100 6.71% $0 $111,100
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 YTD FY10
Dates in Period 3/10-9/10 3/10-9/10
Months in Period 7 7
Expenditures Period 1 YTD FY10
Projected Dollars $64,808 $64,808
Percent 58.33% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $22,859 $22,859
Percent 20.58% 20.58%
Variance Dollars $-41,949 $-41,949
Percent -37.76% -37.76%
Clients Period 1 YTD FY10   Units Period 1 YTD FY10
Projected Clients 249 249 Projected Units 1,297 1,297
Percent 58.33% 58.33% Percent 58.33% 58.33%
Actual Clients 76 76 Actual Units 229 229
Percent 17.80% 17.80% Percent 10.30% 10.30%
Variance Clients -173 -173 Variance Units -1,068 -1,068
Percent -40.53% -40.53% Percent -48.03% -48.03%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category has expenditure rate of 20.57 percent at this period. Target expenditures are 28.57 percent. 1 Fiscal: This category is under performing with a variance of 8.00 percent.
Program: Category achieved 25 percent of the projected client goals and 17 percent of the service unit projections in the first two months of the fiscal year. Program: Why is enrollment at 25 percent only?
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2010 $1,655,104   $111,100 $111,100 6.71% $22,859 $88,241
2009   $1,920,262 $161,188 $161,188 8.39% $121,565 $39,623
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2010 426 76 -350 $300 60.0% 42.0%
2009 221 225 4 $540 82.0% 44.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2010) consumer survey 15 percent of the 461 respondents reporting a need for Mental Health Services said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2009): 225
Est. percent of need met: 85%
Est. clients needing service: 264
Clients served (2010): 76
Est. clients not served (2010): 188
Cost per client (2010): $300
Cost to meet need:    $56,400 
Other Funding Streams
RW MAI EMA $111,100
Baltimore City, Ryan White Part B. $421,640



RW MAI EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $88,241
FY 2011 Info EMA Award: $2,080,356

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.