Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity Scorecard Archive
OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity — EMA (MAI) Period 1 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2010 $1,655,104 $360,764 $0 $360,764 21.80% $0 $360,764
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 YTD FY10
Dates in Period 3/10-9/10 3/10-9/10
Months in Period 7 7
Expenditures Period 1 YTD FY10
Projected Dollars $210,446 $210,446
Percent 58.33% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $69,752 $69,752
Percent 19.33% 19.33%
Variance Dollars $-140,694 $-140,694
Percent -39.00% -39.00%
Clients Period 1 YTD FY10   Units Period 1 YTD FY10
Projected Clients 201 201 Projected Units 975 975
Percent 58.33% 58.33% Percent 58.33% 58.33%
Actual Clients 281 281 Actual Units 627 627
Percent 81.55% 81.55% Percent 37.51% 37.51%
Variance Clients 80 80 Variance Units -348 -348
Percent 23.22% 23.22% Percent -20.82% -20.82%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category has expenditure rate of 19.33 percent at this point. Target expenditures are 28.57 percent. 1 Fiscal: Category has a 9.24 percent variance at this point. Should funds be moved?
Program: Mental health, substance abuse and homelessness measures were over 100 percent of projected client goals. Program: Why is the service unit goals set so low? Are the numbers under reported?
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2010 $1,655,104   $360,764 $360,764 21.80% $69,752 $291,012
2009   $1,920,262 $432,345 $458,155 23.86% $272,113 $186,042
2008   $1,879,856 $449,752 $470,093 25.01% $468,772 $1,321
2007   $1,785,032 $358,970 $358,970 20.11% $353,333 $5,637
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2010 344 281 -63 $248 56.0% 52.0%
2009 165 191 26 $1,424 77.0% 29.0%
2008 200 229 29 $2,047 92.0% 38.0%
2007 179 149 -30 $2,371 94.0% 46.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on OAHS — Primary Medical Care — Co-morbidity available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2010.
Other Funding Streams
RW MAI EMA $360,764



RW MAI EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $291,012
FY 2011 Info EMA Award: $2,080,356

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.