Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
Oral Health Care Scorecard Archive
Oral Health Care — Counties Full Year Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking County Set Aside Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Set Aside Carryover Total Alloc.
2010 M4 $2,355,903 $155,342 $0 $155,342 6.59% $0 $155,342
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY10
Dates in Period 8/10-0/10 1/10-2/10 3/10-7/10 8/10-7/10
Months in Period 5 2 5 12
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY10
Projected Dollars $64,726 $25,890 $64,726 $155,342
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Dollars $50,413 $27,758 $77,171 $155,342
Percent 32.45% 17.87% 49.68% 100.00%
Variance Dollars $-14,313 $1,868 $12,445 $0
Percent -9.21% 1.20% 8.01% 0.00%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY10   Units Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 YTD FY10
Projected Clients 38 15 38 90 Projected Units 218 87 218 522
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 41.67% 100.00%
Actual Clients 0 78 28 106 Actual Units 0 0 656 656
Percent 0.00% 86.67% 31.11% 117.78% Percent 0.00% 0.00% 125.67% 125.67%
Variance Clients -38 63 -10 16 Variance Units -218 -87 438 134
Percent -41.67% 70.00% -10.56% 17.78% Percent -41.67% -16.67% 84.00% 25.67%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: 1 Fiscal: Category not within tolerance Variance is 9.22%
Program: The rate of clients served is high because of continuing clients engaged in multiple procedures as identified in treatment plans. Program: Why were zero prosthodontic fixed procedures projected for this reporting period.
Fiscal: Target expenditures should be at 58.33 percent at the seven-month period. Expenditures are at 50.32 percent. 2 Fiscal: Category has a variance of 8.01 percent and is over expending.
Program: This category did not withstand a two percent or $15,000 reduction in funding from allocation in FY2009. Category was reduced by one program as a result. Program: This category is generally over performing.
Fiscal: The category spent 100% of its allocation. The category expanded by one program through MAI funding and received a 2% reduction in funding from FY 2009. 3 Fiscal: Within tolerance. The category spent 100% of its funding.
Program: Oral health care requires complicated procedures and multiple visits. Successful oral health outcomes depend on medical case management linkages, reciprocal referrals, and awareness of services. 25.47 percent of clients were new to service. Program: Clients accessed services at a higher rate than projected (2.52 vs. 1.91). Less clients are receiving preventative care than projected. More clients needed oral surgery than projected, but needed fewer procedures per client.
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY County Set Aside Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Set Aside Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2010 $2,355,903   $155,342 $155,342 6.59% $155,342 $0
2009   $2,334,014 $155,268 $155,268 6.65% $137,098 $18,170
2008   $2,411,806 $146,198 $139,198 5.77% $126,198 $13,000
2007   $2,470,676 $155,721 $130,721 5.29% $122,973 $7,748
2006   $2,489,638 $116,266 $74,560 2.99% $74,560 $0
2005   $2,259,670 $110,724 $110,724 4.90% $67,492 $43,232
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2010 90 106 16 $1,465 51.0% 29.0%
2009 130 93 -37 $1,474 43.0% 30.0%
2008 115 136 21 $927 54.0% 35.0%
2007 391 350 -41 $351 62.0% 34.0%
2006 132 125 -7 $596 62.0% 36.0%
2005 343 195 -148 $346 67.0% 43.0%
Planning
Unmet Need
As of the last (2010) consumer survey 44 percent of the 649 respondents reporting a need for Oral Health Care said they could not get it.
Clients survey year (FY 2009): 93
Est. percent of need met: 56%
Est. clients needing service: 166
Clients served (2010): 106
Est. clients not served (2010): 60
Cost per client (2010): $1,465
Cost to meet need:    $87,900 
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A Counties $155,342
(RW Part A EMA) $867,337
MAI (EMA and Counties) $148,252
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH), Infectious Disease and Environmental Health Services (IDEHA) $607,085
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH), Infectious Disease and Environmental Health Services (IDEHA). $601,174
City of Baltimore, Ryan White Par B. $538,315



RW Part A Counties
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $0
Performance Summary:
The category spent all of its funding and served more clients than projected.
Compared to Last Year:
Compared to FY 2009, the category served 13.98% more clients. Category did not receive a significant increase since FY 2009.
Unmet Need:
Services were expanded by program in FY 2010, which will increase access to oral health services. Oral health care remains critical to the overall medical health and well being of PLWH/As.
Questions:
How does the expansion of services using MAI funds affect the need for Part A funding in this category?
Comments:
Can the category absorb more funding and serve more clients? FY 2010 unite data are duplicated.
FY 2011 Info County Set Aside: $2,253,517

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.