To date, FY 2011 expenditures are 21.6% less than the total dollars expended at the same period in FY 2010 – ($428,986). The low expenditure rate can be explained by late hiring for multiple positions. The Grantee recommends a reduction of $11,720.
1
Fiscal:
The category has a variance of $103,171.
Program:
Actual services rendered under each approved modality include treatment days and counseling sessions (individual/group). The category does not provide ambulatory detoxification services.
Program:
Are the late hires due to delayed contract ratification? How much of the variance is due to late hires?
*
This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon
the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
**
This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based
upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the
prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow
the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal
to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.
As of the last (2010) consumer survey
15 percent of the
237 respondents reporting a need for
Substance-abuse Treatment — Outpatient said they could not get it.
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here.
All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office
at +1 (410) 662-7253.