Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Queen Anne's County
Information Portal
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) Scorecard Archive
OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) — EMA Period 2 Scorecard © 2008-2012, InterGroup Services, Inc.
FY Ranking EMA Award Initial Allocation Reprogramming Total Allocation % of Award Carryover Total Alloc.
2007 $16,308,921 $4,142,096 $0 $4,142,096 25.40% $0 $4,142,096
Current Performance
Reporting Period Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Dates in Period 8/08-0/08 1/08-2/08 8/08-2/08
Months in Period 5 2 7
Expenditures Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Projected Dollars $1,725,873 $690,349 $2,416,223
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Dollars $484,333 $778,935 $1,263,268
Percent 11.69% 18.81% 30.50%
Variance Dollars $-1,241,540 $88,586 $-1,152,955
Percent -29.97% 2.14% -27.84%
Clients Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07   Units Period 1 Period 2 YTD FY07
Projected Clients 1,988 795 2,783 Projected Units 9,504 3,802 13,306
Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33% Percent 41.67% 16.67% 58.33%
Actual Clients 2,739 261 3,000 Actual Units 6,892 1,108 8,000
Percent 57.41% 5.47% 62.88% Percent 30.21% 4.86% 35.07%
Variance Clients 751 -534 217 Variance Units -2,612 -2,694 -5,306
Percent 15.74% -11.20% 4.55% Percent -11.45% -11.81% -23.26%
About Current Performance
  Grantee Comments Period   Questions to Consider
Fiscal: Category performing at 18 percent expenditure rate. 1 Fiscal: Category performing below expenditure rate. Should money be programmed out of category?
Program: Performing at 53 percent of projected client goals and 23 percent of unit goals. Technical assistance provided to four providers. Program: Planning council planning will be adjusted upon outcomes of the technical assistance provided to the four providers.
Fiscal: Category performing at 29 percent expenditure rate. 2 Fiscal: Planning council should consider moving funds.
Program: Category performing at 50 percent of client goals and 55 percent of unit goals. Program: Client goals and service units were adjusted downwards, which accounts for meeting mid-year projections.
* This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
** This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.


- page 2 -

Historical Performance © 2008-2012  InterGroup Services, Inc.    (ph) 410.662.7253
Funding/Fiscal
FY EMA Award Allocat. to Category Allocat. + Reprogram. % of Award Amount Spent $ Unspent
(No Carry.)
2007 $16,308,921   $4,142,096 $4,142,096 25.40% $1,263,268 $2,878,828
2006   $18,975,908 $4,271,116 $4,208,576 22.18% $4,162,387 $46,189
2005   $17,144,692 $3,801,530 $3,698,985 21.58% $3,607,428 $91,557
2004   $17,811,946 $3,949,585 $3,983,585 22.36% $3,881,617 $101,968
2003   $19,461,123 $4,847,766 $4,854,590 24.95% $4,743,406 $111,184
2002   $16,137,634 $4,071,928 $4,640,157 28.75% $4,359,510 $280,647
Clients
FY Project. Actual Vari. Cost Per
Client
Af.-Am.
Percent
WICY
Percent
2007 4,771 3,000 -1,771 $421 95.0% 72.0%
2006 4,962 4,214 -748 $987 80.0% 42.0%
2005 4,386 4,309 -77 $837 82.0% 33.5%
2004 4,637 4,581 -56 $847 83.0% 33.9%
2003 5,300 5,184 -116 $915 74.5% 32.1%
2002 3,337 3,714 377 $1,173 82.6% 34.6%
Planning
Unmet Need
There is no unmet-need data on OAHS — Primary Medical Care (PMC) available from the consumer survey relevant for FY 2007.
Other Funding Streams
RW Part A EMA $4,142,096
DHMH, Medical Assistance, AIDS HealthChoice Enrollment $67,194,472
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice Disabled Enrollment $16,612,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV HealthChoice FAC Enrollment $3,794,395
DHMH, Infectious Disease and Environmental Health Administration. $2,900,000
DHMH, Medical Assistance, HIV/AIDS Primary Adult Care (PAC) Enrollment $2,021,104
Baltimore City RW Part B $1,413,044
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants $1,113,985
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title A HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants. $1,017,362
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early intervention. $603,827
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White C Grants to provide outpatient early. $603,748
Represents two RW Part C-funded program (not an aggregate of all Part C programs for this service). $440,629
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $184,660
Total Health Care, Inc., Ryan White Title B HIV Care Formula Grants. $177,891
Baltimore Co. RW Part B $109,208



RW Part A EMA
Other Funding
Final Analysis
Unspent (including carryover/adjust.): $2,878,828
FY 2008 Info Rank: M2 EMA Award: $15,625,276

Browse Scorecards By Year
Home
Greater Baltimore
HIV Health Services
Planning Council
Primary Web Site
Quick Links
Browse Categories
Browse Scorecards
By Period
By Category
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here. All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office at +1 (410) 662-7253.