The Grantee recommends reducing the category by $2,500. Remaining funds would be shifted within the category to address reprogramming requests. This funding would be used to provide an additional 560 one way taxi trips, reflective of FY 2010 performance.
1
Fiscal:
FY 2010 allocation was $149,980 of which 99.77% of the funding was expended. The ESD report has 18.8% variance but the scorecard has 22.41%.
Program:
High variance stemmed from provider restrictions on utilization of services, and a result of inaccurate program projections by one program and delayed funding.
Program:
Number of total service units is lower than projected. Were the provider restrictions due to the delayed contracting issues for this fiscal year? Were the providers asked whether they are able to utilize the funds unexpended for the remainder of the year?
*
This is the difference between the current expenditures and where the current expenditures should be at this point in the year based upon
the total allocation (plus carryover) and the assumption that expenditures are spread evenly over the year.
**
This is the difference between last year's actual expenditures at this point in the year and where the expenditures should have been based
upon the final expenditure and the assumption that expenditures would be spread evenly over the year. (If the current-year bar is similar to the
prior-year bar, then the current year is following the prior year's pattern and is on track to meet the current projection [should it continue to follow
the prior year's pattern]). Note: This bar should always be at zero variance for the final period of the year (as the actual expenditure is exactly equal
to where expenditures should be at that time of year given the final expenditure.
To report a problem with the mechanics of the web site, please click here.
All content-related comments should be referred directly to the planning council support office
at +1 (410) 662-7253.